The Revolution in Human Affairs
Disclaimer
Purpose
Here's Where We Are
Why? There Are Two Problems to Deal with Today
What can be Learned from Other, But Isn't
Trends that are Ignored Despite Extensive Proof
And, Several Factors are Against Military-A
This Explains It All!
The End State! What the Candidates Should Focus On -- But Do Not -- Creating Trust!
Where We Need to Go
Maneuver Warfare Must Focus The Personnel System
In Sum: Where We Need To Go
The Revolution in Human Affairs Changing the Culture for the 21st Century
Goal
What Should the Personnel System Do?
Why Look at the Personnel System?
Defining the Problems
What did the War in Kosovo Tell Us?
How Do We Change?
Organizing for Military Excellence Snapshot of Recommendations
Overview
Fundamental Conflict is Between the "Parts" and the "Whole"
The Current Personnel System Creates ... A Conflict ... That Few Can Escape
The Larger the U. S. Culture Assists in Stimulating the Conflict
The Fundamental Challenge: How Do We Synthesize the “Parts” into a Coherent “Whole?”
The Army Way?
… or ... The Army Ideal
(1776-1939)
From the Progressive Era to Systems Analysis
The French Influence
The Lasting Influence of George Marshall
1946-1950 The Army Mutates into a Business
1950-1953 Korea: A Red Flag Ignored
1955-1960 Classical Values Decay Further during the Pentomic Era
1961-1972 Decline in Classical Values Comes to a Head in Vietnam Era
1970-1976 Officer Personnel Management System Reform Falls Short
1980-Present The Defense Personnel Act of 1980 (DOPMA) Modification of OPA-47
1973-1990 The Post Vietnam Reforms
1862-1990 Unit Cohesion or Unit Rotation
1862-1990 What the Army Does Not Understand About Unit Cohesion
1979-1990 The Rise and Demise of COHORT
1989-1991 The Prefect Pentagon Wars
(1989)1991- Present: The Drawdown Pulls Off the Band Aid
1996-Present: OPMS XXI Falls Short
1947-Present: The "Up-and=Out" Promotion System
Present: The "Water Walker's" Career
The Army Continues to Advocate Technology
Conclusion
An Overview of Other Personnel Systems
Officer Corps of Successful Armies
The Roman Army: 216 BC-52 BC
The Army of Napoleon: 1798-1806
The Finish Army: 1939-1940
The German Officer Corps: 1809-1942
The Israeli Army: 1948-1973?
Officer Corps of Unsuccessful Armies
The Prussian Army of 1806
The French Army of 1870-1914 & 1919-1940
The Italian Army 1914-1942
The British Army 1856,1898,1939-1942
Typical Attributes in Successful Armies
Conclusions
Proposals for An Effective 21st Century Army
To Resolve the Fundamental Conflict Between "efficiency" and "effectiveness"
The End State!
The Problem
The Evolution of Warfare
End of the Cold War I
End of the Cold War II
A Personnel System Tuned to 2nd. Generation Warfare I
A Personnel System Tuned to 2nd. Generation Warfare II
A Personnel System Tuned to 2nd. Generation Warfare III
Result: Mismatch Between a 2nd. Generation Army and Future Warfare
Mismatch Between Current System (II) and Future Warfare
The Answer to the Mismatch Between Current System and Future Warfare
First: A New Doctrine for Future Warfare Focuses The Personnel System
The Timeline
Reform DOPMA
Reform DOPMA: "Up-or-Stay"
A New Organizational Structure
Flatten the Officer Corps
Where to Flatten the Officer Corps
The Force Structure
The New Army Staff
The Corps Group
The Corps Group (Maneuver - Heavy)
The Regimental System
Aligning the Officer System
Build Officer Policies Around a Unit System
Change Accessions
Officer Professional Tracks Highlighting Strengths
Officer Tracks: Tactical
Officer Tracks: Operational
Officer Tracks: Technical
Education
Training
Change the All or Nothing Retirement
Final Thoughts
Resistance to Change