|
4GW, High Noon, And How Even I Get It Now.
Bryce Lane1
If there was ever a time for philosophers
and free thinkers to return to public life now is it. The people who
have tried to make a small science of conflict have failed. It’s a time,
as the Mossad used to say, “for the meshugenehs2
to be heard”.
In 4GW “enemy” has many shades of meaning. “Enemy”
can mean guerrillas actually shooting at you, sure. Yet there are even
more important and dangerous meanings to this word. A connected opinion
leader who just lost a loved one and now wants to see all of your kind
dead everywhere is far more a liability than an addled teenager with
a rifle. A corporation or religious group may use state resources ruthlessly,
knowing that they will not be paying the bill. These “enemies” cannot
all be handled in the same way.
Even the word “enemy” is a thing to consider carefully.
4GW is not paranoia, but it requires that we understand and work at
organizational levels, to rearrange and manipulate relationships and
organizations beyond ineffective “psyops” like mobile loudspeakers and
throwing candy to children—free of entertaining yet empty political
gestures.
Here are three auspicious strategies. It's a paraphrase of Boyd3, but I find 1-2-3 a bit easier to remember in my own case.
-
Channel, reward and energize the committed.
Give them something to win, materially and socially, by their active
support.
-
Attract and employ the uncommitted. Give them
some hope of a tolerable normalcy yet also give them something to
lose by opposition.
-
Isolate, stigmatize and criminalize committed
opposition. Give them something to fear from the first two groups
before you have anything significant to fear from them.
At the bedrock it is most important to remember
that no matter what the official rules or structure, all organizations
are composed of human relationships. Lone individuals can cause disorder,
but nothing intentional and permanent comes without the connections
to make and keep it so. Caesar may have marched on Rome. Yet without
enough of Rome to help, he might have been run right back out.
4GW is “network warfare”, but the networks are of
humans. It’s not about swarms, game theory or how many laptops you can
connect over a satellite. It’s about the quality, quantity and capabilities
of useful assets you can bring to your cause for whatever reason.
On a tactical level:
-
Know them—Take time, make contacts, draw maps.
In any organization few people support it for the stated goals.
Know what the insiders want, not just ideologically but personally
if necessary. “Idealists, realists, opportunists, and radicals”?
Create issues, rewards, and obstacles for each subgroup that arrange
or divide them in ways most favorable to your tactical goals at
any particular time without sacrificing your strategy. Without this
map, you don't have an OODA loop at all. You don't know what you're
looking at. You haven't any reference points for orientation. You
will make the wrong decisions consistently and any corrections you
make afterwards will bad. Not only this but doubt from previous
fiascoes will make you uncertain, conflicted and slow. If you are
here, quit, leave, apologize and do your fieldwork better next time.
-
Watch how intelligent crime outfits control
entire societies. These guys find cooperative insiders. Once they
are in, the idealists can be channeled, realists employed, opportunists
recruited and opposing “true believers” dealt with locally. Never
underestimate the ability of people to participate and advance within
corrupt structures without the idea occurring to them. Most of the
world is run this way (even here, yes?). Tilting this in a favorable
direction is a lot less expensive than sending in the cruise missiles.
-
Do not openly conflict with anyone who isn't
set up for a visible fall. It unites or creates opposition where
it was not before. If you do wish to create a conflict, start it
from a direction not easily attributable to yourself. The real power
in such a situation belongs to the party who makes the deal necessary
to both sides; Be that party! The British during their apex were
masters of this. The fewer “High Noon” scenes you create for yourself
the better.
-
Dump the notion that war is just about “hitting
targets”. If some party is an immediate danger then do what you
must. However, choose carefully. It is often better to have live
possible assets—even unknowing, marginal, or paid-off—than dead
martyrs. Attack the relationships and the individuals become ineffective.
-
The hands you lose sight of strike you the hardest.
The idea of even a fully committed superpower cowing the world into
fawning submission is silly. However, all over you can hear familiar
music, see goods and ideas that come from here as well as local
adaptations returning. Doing business will get you back-channels,
small cooperations, allies and assets when you need them. The United
States and Europe have cultural capital far beyond our military
means. In fact if there is a chance of lasting victory in 4GW, it
is here.
-
Watch your back. The greatest dangers in 4GW
can come from people in your own camp who see opportunities to hijack
your organizational resources toward their own ends. Not only big
issues like profiteering and grand intrigues, but petty “kingdom
creation” and “why not this too” issues. This is destructive, since
it creates more inside friction while simultaneously reducing your
ability to fight outside. The seeds of paralysis and defeat in 4GW
are here. Helping an enemy to do this to himself is good; permitting
it in your own camp is poison.
We need to get outside our views that all issues
need to be resolved with techno-annihilation of “evil”. If we destroy
connections moral, social, business or otherwise, then we only “isolate,
stigmatize and criminalize” ourselves. There are other relationships
than “love or fear”; sometimes just “helpful” is good enough.
If you consider the resources that are more effective
on an organizational level than “killin' people and breakin' things,”
you can see that 4GW isn't so “asymmetrical”. Save the “shock and awe”
for when we really need it. 2GW and 3GW are not gone, just waiting for
someone to polarize the world enough to bring them back. I hope it’s
not us.
Sun Tzu wrote that “The battle is best decided before
armies take to the field”. This may be politically unlikely at the moment,
but we must build the networks to do it effectively or we will continue
to wrap an OODA loop around our own necks, tightening with every bad
move.
1 Mr. Lane, a self-confessed meshugeneh, is
a former AAU champion powerlifter who is now a personal trainer and
martial artist.
2 Literally, a crazy person. In normal usage, would
suggest some endearment or familiarity, as with a dotty aunt.
3 DNI Editor’s note: see for example, “Patterns
of Conflict”, 140-141, and “Strategic Game,” 54-57.
|